Do you need an HR Director, or just HR Director-level thinking?

When a growing business realises it needs more HR capability, there’s an obvious assumption:

Hire an HR Director.

But that isn’t always the right answer.

The right solution depends on the problem you’re trying to solve, the stage the business is at and what needs to happen next.

Sometimes you need specialist advice.

Sometimes you need stronger day-to-day HR support.

Sometimes you genuinely need permanent HR leadership.

And sometimes you need the level of thinking, experience and challenge that an HR Director brings, without needing that person five days a week, twelve months a year.

The starting point shouldn’t be “What HR role do we need?” It should be “What business challenge are we trying to solve?”

Start with the problem, not the job title

There are several different levels of HR support a growing business might need.

If you’re dealing with a complex legal question, an employment lawyer is the right specialist.

If the requirement is primarily day-to-day HR support, an HR Adviser, HR Manager or outsourced HR provider may be entirely appropriate.

If people strategy has become a permanent part of the leadership agenda, a permanent Head of HR or HR Director may make sense.

But there is another point on the spectrum.

You may need someone experienced enough to lead the work, challenge the leadership team and make things happen, without necessarily needing that person permanently.

That’s where interim and fractional HR leadership can be particularly useful.

The important thing is understanding the difference between them.

When is outsourced HR enough?

For many businesses, outsourced HR works extremely well.

If the focus is on day-to-day support, policies, employee relations and occasional advice, an outsourced provider can provide the expertise a business needs without the commitment of a senior permanent hire.

It’s particularly appropriate when the business is relatively stable and the people agenda isn’t changing dramatically.

The question is whether the business needs someone to support the organisation, or someone to lead the people agenda.

As those needs diverge, a different level of capability may be required.

When does a business need a permanent HR leader?

Usually when people decisions have become a permanent feature of the leadership agenda.

If workforce planning, culture, leadership development, organisational design and long-term people strategy are regularly being discussed at board level, that’s often a sign that dedicated HR leadership is needed within the business.

A permanent Head of HR or HR Director can provide continuity, ownership and a sustained voice at leadership level.

They become part of the organisation rather than being brought in to solve a particular period of change.

But not every business needs that level of resource all of the time.

When is fractional HR leadership the sweet spot?

Fractional HR leadership can work particularly well for growing SMEs that need senior HR thinking without a full-time senior HR hire.

Often, there is already a capable HR team in place. What they’re missing is additional experience around growth, organisational change, leadership challenges or a strategic project.

A fractional HR leader can provide that additional layer of expertise and challenge without creating the overhead of a permanent appointment.

They can work with the leadership team, shape the people strategy, challenge assumptions, support the existing HR function and lead important work.

The key difference is that they aren’t simply providing additional HR capacity.

They’re bringing a different level of thinking and experience into the business.

When is interim the better answer?

Interim HR leadership is usually the better fit when there’s a defined project, challenge or period of change that needs ownership.

That might be:

• an acquisition
• a restructure
• rapid growth
• a leadership transition
• a redundancy programme
• a significant organisational change
• a gap while recruiting a permanent HR leader

The requirement may be urgent, but it may also be temporary.

In those situations, the focus is often on delivery, momentum and getting something important over the line.

That’s different from fractional leadership, where the business may need an ongoing level of senior HR thinking but not necessarily on a full-time basis.

The two models can overlap, but the question is always the same: what does the business actually need this person to achieve?

Where do businesses choose the wrong solution?

Usually when they jump to the solution before fully understanding the problem.

I’ve seen businesses recruit a permanent HR Director when what they really needed was experienced support through a defined period of change.

Equally, organisations can try to manage significant transformation through operational HR support alone when what they really need is strategic leadership.

Neither approach is necessarily wrong.

The issue is the mismatch between the capability required and the solution chosen.

That’s why the best starting point is rarely:

“What HR role should we hire?”

It’s:

“What business challenge are we trying to solve?”

Once that is clear, the right HR solution becomes much easier to identify.

But isn’t fractional HR expensive?

It’s a fair question.

An experienced HR leader working on a day rate can initially look expensive compared with employing someone permanently.

But the comparison isn’t really salary versus day rate.

It’s:

What capability does the business need, for how long, and what does it need that person to achieve?

A business may not need twelve months of senior HR leadership.

It might need four months of experienced leadership to diagnose what’s wrong, create a plan, lead a change programme, strengthen the existing team, implement new processes and support managers.

The value isn’t simply in the time the person spends in the business.

It’s in what changes as a result.

How quickly can an experienced HR leader add value?

Often much quicker than businesses expect.

An experienced interim or fractional HR leader isn’t starting their career on day one. They’re bringing experience from multiple organisations and similar challenges.

The first few weeks are usually about listening, understanding the business and identifying the key issues.

By around 60 days, there should be a clear plan, agreed priorities and progress underway.

By 90 days, there should be tangible changes being delivered.

That might mean stronger management capability, improved processes, an organisational change programme or resolution of people challenges that were slowing the business down.

The exact deliverables will vary, but the principle remains the same:

The output should be more than advice. It should be progress.

Sometimes the biggest value comes from identifying the real problem quickly.

A business may believe it has a recruitment or talent attraction issue, for example, only to discover that management capability and employee experience are the bigger challenges.

Solving those underlying issues can improve retention and reduce the ongoing pressure on recruitment.

That’s one of the advantages of bringing in an experienced pair of eyes.

They can ask the questions that haven’t been asked, challenge assumptions and spot patterns that may be difficult to see from inside the organisation.

What happens when they leave?

This is another important question.

If the requirement is genuinely temporary, the objective shouldn’t be to create dependency.

It should be to leave the business stronger than you found it.

That might mean developing the existing HR team.

It might mean putting better processes in place.

It might mean giving managers greater capability.

It might mean creating a people strategy.

It might mean clarifying organisational structure and accountability.

Or it might mean helping the business understand what permanent HR leadership should look like in the future.

The best interim and fractional HR leaders shouldn’t leave a gap when they move on.

They should leave capability behind.

Capability

One of the biggest measures of success is whether managers and leaders are better equipped to handle people challenges themselves.

If a business is less reliant on external support six months later than it was when the assignment began, that’s usually a good sign.

Processes

Good HR leaders don’t introduce process for the sake of it.

They create practical, scalable processes that help the business operate more effectively and consistently as it grows.

Strategy

Sometimes the business knows it has people challenges but isn’t clear on the priorities.

A strong HR leader can help create a roadmap that connects the people agenda with the wider business strategy.

A stronger HR team

Where there’s already an HR team in place, a good interim or fractional leader should develop and mentor that team, helping build capability and confidence for the future.

Clearer structure

As businesses grow, reporting lines, accountability and decision-making can become blurred.

Experienced HR leadership can help create greater clarity around roles, responsibilities and organisational design.

And, perhaps most importantly, clarity

Clarity around the challenges facing the business.

Clarity around priorities.

Clarity around what good looks like moving forward.

Sometimes that objective perspective is just as valuable as any process or programme that gets implemented.

The answer isn’t always a permanent hire

One of the useful things about bringing in senior HR expertise on an interim or fractional basis is that it can help a business make a better long-term decision.

In some cases, the assignment confirms that permanent HR leadership is needed because people strategy has become a core part of the leadership agenda.

In others, the opposite happens.

The business realises that with the right structure, stronger managers and an empowered HR team, it doesn’t need a full-time HR Director.

The value isn’t simply in providing senior HR expertise. It’s in helping the business understand what it actually needs.

That means businesses can solve the immediate challenge while making a more informed decision about their longer-term HR structure, rather than committing to a permanent hire too early.

And ultimately, that’s the point.

You don’t always need an HR Director. But you may need HR Director-level thinking.

Continue the conversation

In our previous article, we looked at the moments when growing businesses can suddenly need more HR capability, from rapid growth and management challenges to major organisational change.

← The Moments When Growing Businesses Need More HR Than They Realise

But once you’ve identified the need, there’s another question: do you need to hire that capability permanently?

Next: You Don’t Have to Hire an HR Director to Get HR Director-Level Thinking →

Contact Alasdair about Senior HR Interim | Download the Salary Survey across the Solent and Thames Valley regions.